“Tactical Mastery is a choice”
PvE, Talents September 27th, 2007Ok, I don’t play wow for a good half year now, but I watch wowinsider regularly. I’ve just read planned changes for patch 2.3:
[Warrior] While arms/fury warriors aren’t meant to be as good as protection warriors at tanking, we do plan to make an additional to Tactical Mastery that may help them out. This talent will grant greatly increased threat from Mortal Strike and Bloodthirst when in Defensive Stance.
It’s like Blizzard saying “oh yeah, we said before Tactical Mastery is a choice, we were lying, and we are going to buff it even more to make it more must have then it’s now”. Why do you people still keep playing that shit when people like Kalagan officially state that Warlocks are designed to dominate 1v1. Get a grip.
Oh, I’m in Warhammer closed beta, it’s great :).
Terhix
September 28th, 2007 at 4:26 am
Meh. I can beat most locks save for drain tanks. It’s not a big deal to throw 3 points into TM for pvp.
September 28th, 2007 at 7:11 am
When I’ve quit WoW I had 33/28 build, finally free from Tactical Mastery, that was before flurry nerf also. Blizzard was saying over and over again that TM is a ‘choice’, and when they finally made in an option you can live without, now they turn it into must have it was before, way to go…
If they are so obsessed about arms and fury tanking, why don’t they give something to increase threat in arms or fury tree, warriors have a freaking improved MS talent after all, it’s not rocket science.
September 28th, 2007 at 9:18 pm
but is there anything usefull from the new patch for fury warriors or is it just made it still kinda crapy for them
September 28th, 2007 at 9:28 pm
oh and by the way if anyone wanna hang out or stuff im on ravenholdt and the names anderdrah